Fighting...But For What?

John Kerry says he is in a "fighting mood" after delivering his ridiculous speech at NYU. This begs the question what is he fighting for? The answer seems to be pretty simple, he is fighting to surrender. That was the meaning of his NYU speech, nothing more.

I wish it didn't, but the fact is ... on Iraq, they haven't leveled with the American people and we deserve a president of the United States who looks Americans in the eye and tells you the truth.

He says. Which truth does he want to tell the American people? Is it the truth that the war was worth fighting, which was his initial position? Or is it that he would not have gone to war, which was his second position? Or was it that someone not realizing that with Saddam gone the US is safer doesn't have the judgment to be President? Or is it the "wrong war....."? Which "truth" does Senator Kerry wish us to believe?

The main truth is that this candidate is a joke. He is worse than Clinton in his prevarications; at least Clinton's were in a time and about relatively small things. Kerry is talking about life and death issues for tens of thousands of people, and the only idea conveyed by him is "I should be President because I was born in the west wing of a hospital". No ideas, just entitlement.