In sum, a Kerry presidency will lack either the vision or the resolve to finish the war, resulting in a defeat for the United States in Iraq — with calamitous consequences for the brave reformers there, an end to liberal momentum in the Middle East, a reversal in the conduct of Libya, Pakistan, and the Gulf, and assurance to Syria, Lebanon, and Iran that the United States is conducting not war but a criminal investigation akin to efforts against gambling or prostitution. Chamberlain-like, we will return to the complacency of the pre-9/11 days, regarding the telltale signs of the destruction to come as mere "nuisances." All the hysterical invective of John Kerry's surrogates — like George Soros, Michael Moore, Terry McAuliffe, and Teresa Heinz Kerry — cannot change that bleak and depressing fact.
Wednesday, October 27, 2004
Crossroads of History
This election has been described by many as one of the most important in decades. It will determine whether we continue on a course of confrontation with and transformation of the Arab Middle East, or whether we again withdraw and hope that they will leave us alone. Victor Hanson defines what this election is really about and why Kerry is just not serious enough to be President at a time like this.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment